Recreational marijuana in NYS?  Governor Cuomo calls for legalizing it

Recreational marijuana in NYS? Governor Cuomo calls for legalizing it


AGENDA AGENDA FOR AGENDA FOR THE AGENDA FOR THE
COMING AGENDA FOR THE
COMING YEAR, AGENDA FOR THE
COMING YEAR,
GOVERNOR AGENDA FOR THE
COMING YEAR,
GOVERNOR CUOMO COMING YEAR,
GOVERNOR CUOMO COMING YEAR,
GOVERNOR CUOMO
TODAY COMING YEAR,
GOVERNOR CUOMO
TODAY MADE COMING YEAR,
GOVERNOR CUOMO
TODAY MADE HIS GOVERNOR CUOMO
TODAY MADE HIS GOVERNOR CUOMO
TODAY MADE HIS
STRONGEST TODAY MADE HIS
STRONGEST TODAY MADE HIS
STRONGEST
STATEMENTS TODAY MADE HIS
STRONGEST
STATEMENTS EVER, TODAY MADE HIS
STRONGEST
STATEMENTS EVER, IN STRONGEST
STATEMENTS EVER, IN STRONGEST
STATEMENTS EVER, IN
FAVOR STRONGEST
STATEMENTS EVER, IN
FAVOR OF STRONGEST
STATEMENTS EVER, IN
FAVOR OF LEGALIZING STATEMENTS EVER, IN
FAVOR OF LEGALIZING STATEMENTS EVER, IN
FAVOR OF LEGALIZING
THE STATEMENTS EVER, IN
FAVOR OF LEGALIZING
THE USE STATEMENTS EVER, IN
FAVOR OF LEGALIZING
THE USE OF FAVOR OF LEGALIZING
THE USE OF FAVOR OF LEGALIZING
THE USE OF
“RECREATIONAL” THE USE OF
“RECREATIONAL” THE USE OF
“RECREATIONAL”
MARIJUANA. “RECREATIONAL”
MARIJUANA. “RECREATIONAL”
MARIJUANA.
ONCE “RECREATIONAL”
MARIJUANA.
ONCE “LUKE-WARM” “RECREATIONAL”
MARIJUANA.
ONCE “LUKE-WARM” TO MARIJUANA.
ONCE “LUKE-WARM” TO MARIJUANA.
ONCE “LUKE-WARM” TO
THE MARIJUANA.
ONCE “LUKE-WARM” TO
THE IDEA, MARIJUANA.
ONCE “LUKE-WARM” TO
THE IDEA, CUOMO MARIJUANA.
ONCE “LUKE-WARM” TO
THE IDEA, CUOMO IS ONCE “LUKE-WARM” TO
THE IDEA, CUOMO IS ONCE “LUKE-WARM” TO
THE IDEA, CUOMO IS
NOW ONCE “LUKE-WARM” TO
THE IDEA, CUOMO IS
NOW URGING THE IDEA, CUOMO IS
NOW URGING THE IDEA, CUOMO IS
NOW URGING
LEGISLATORS THE IDEA, CUOMO IS
NOW URGING
LEGISLATORS TO THE IDEA, CUOMO IS
NOW URGING
LEGISLATORS TO MAKE NOW URGING
LEGISLATORS TO MAKE NOW URGING
LEGISLATORS TO MAKE
LEGALIZING NOW URGING
LEGISLATORS TO MAKE
LEGALIZING POT NOW URGING
LEGISLATORS TO MAKE
LEGALIZING POT A LEGISLATORS TO MAKE
LEGALIZING POT A LEGISLATORS TO MAKE
LEGALIZING POT A
PRIORITY LEGISLATORS TO MAKE
LEGALIZING POT A
PRIORITY IN LEGISLATORS TO MAKE
LEGALIZING POT A
PRIORITY IN NEW LEGISLATORS TO MAKE
LEGALIZING POT A
PRIORITY IN NEW YORK, LEGALIZING POT A
PRIORITY IN NEW YORK, LEGALIZING POT A
PRIORITY IN NEW YORK,
EVEN LEGALIZING POT A
PRIORITY IN NEW YORK,
EVEN THOUGH LEGALIZING POT A
PRIORITY IN NEW YORK,
EVEN THOUGH HE PRIORITY IN NEW YORK,
EVEN THOUGH HE PRIORITY IN NEW YORK,
EVEN THOUGH HE
OFFERED PRIORITY IN NEW YORK,
EVEN THOUGH HE
OFFERED NO PRIORITY IN NEW YORK,
EVEN THOUGH HE
OFFERED NO DETAILS EVEN THOUGH HE
OFFERED NO DETAILS EVEN THOUGH HE
OFFERED NO DETAILS
OF EVEN THOUGH HE
OFFERED NO DETAILS
OF HOW EVEN THOUGH HE
OFFERED NO DETAILS
OF HOW IT EVEN THOUGH HE
OFFERED NO DETAILS
OF HOW IT MIGHT OFFERED NO DETAILS
OF HOW IT MIGHT OFFERED NO DETAILS
OF HOW IT MIGHT
WORK. OF HOW IT MIGHT
WORK. OF HOW IT MIGHT
WORK.
2 OF HOW IT MIGHT
WORK.
2 ON OF HOW IT MIGHT
WORK.
2 ON YOUR OF HOW IT MIGHT
WORK.
2 ON YOUR SIDE’S OF HOW IT MIGHT
WORK.
2 ON YOUR SIDE’S DAVE WORK.
2 ON YOUR SIDE’S DAVE WORK.
2 ON YOUR SIDE’S DAVE
MC-KINLEY WORK.
2 ON YOUR SIDE’S DAVE
MC-KINLEY HAS WORK.
2 ON YOUR SIDE’S DAVE
MC-KINLEY HAS THE 2 ON YOUR SIDE’S DAVE
MC-KINLEY HAS THE 2 ON YOUR SIDE’S DAVE
MC-KINLEY HAS THE
STORY. MC-KINLEY HAS THE
STORY. STORY. “LETS “LETS LEGALIZE “LETS LEGALIZE THE “LETS LEGALIZE THE
ADULT “LETS LEGALIZE THE
ADULT USE “LETS LEGALIZE THE
ADULT USE OF “LETS LEGALIZE THE
ADULT USE OF
MARIJUANA “LETS LEGALIZE THE
ADULT USE OF
MARIJUANA ONCE “LETS LEGALIZE THE
ADULT USE OF
MARIJUANA ONCE AND ADULT USE OF
MARIJUANA ONCE AND ADULT USE OF
MARIJUANA ONCE AND
FOR ADULT USE OF
MARIJUANA ONCE AND
FOR ALL…. MARIJUANA ONCE AND
FOR ALL…. MARIJUANA ONCE AND
FOR ALL….
” FOR ALL….
” FOR ALL….

WHILE FOR ALL….

WHILE THAT FOR ALL….

WHILE THAT GOT FOR ALL….

WHILE THAT GOT A FOR ALL….

WHILE THAT GOT A LOT ”
WHILE THAT GOT A LOT ”
WHILE THAT GOT A LOT
OF ”
WHILE THAT GOT A LOT
OF PEOPLE ”
WHILE THAT GOT A LOT
OF PEOPLE CHARGED WHILE THAT GOT A LOT
OF PEOPLE CHARGED WHILE THAT GOT A LOT
OF PEOPLE CHARGED
UP, WHILE THAT GOT A LOT
OF PEOPLE CHARGED
UP, ONCE WHILE THAT GOT A LOT
OF PEOPLE CHARGED
UP, ONCE AGAIN WHILE THAT GOT A LOT
OF PEOPLE CHARGED
UP, ONCE AGAIN THE OF PEOPLE CHARGED
UP, ONCE AGAIN THE OF PEOPLE CHARGED
UP, ONCE AGAIN THE
GOVERNOR OF PEOPLE CHARGED
UP, ONCE AGAIN THE
GOVERNOR OFFERED UP, ONCE AGAIN THE
GOVERNOR OFFERED UP, ONCE AGAIN THE
GOVERNOR OFFERED
NO UP, ONCE AGAIN THE
GOVERNOR OFFERED
NO SPECIFICS UP, ONCE AGAIN THE
GOVERNOR OFFERED
NO SPECIFICS ABOUT GOVERNOR OFFERED
NO SPECIFICS ABOUT GOVERNOR OFFERED
NO SPECIFICS ABOUT
HOW GOVERNOR OFFERED
NO SPECIFICS ABOUT
HOW THIS GOVERNOR OFFERED
NO SPECIFICS ABOUT
HOW THIS WOULD NO SPECIFICS ABOUT
HOW THIS WOULD NO SPECIFICS ABOUT
HOW THIS WOULD
WORK. HOW THIS WOULD
WORK. HOW THIS WOULD
WORK.
“WE HOW THIS WOULD
WORK.
“WE DO HOW THIS WOULD
WORK.
“WE DO NOT HOW THIS WOULD
WORK.
“WE DO NOT SUPPORT WORK.
“WE DO NOT SUPPORT WORK.
“WE DO NOT SUPPORT
LEGALIZING WORK.
“WE DO NOT SUPPORT
LEGALIZING MARIJUANA WORK.
“WE DO NOT SUPPORT
LEGALIZING MARIJUANA ” “WE DO NOT SUPPORT
LEGALIZING MARIJUANA ” “WE DO NOT SUPPORT
LEGALIZING MARIJUANA ”
JODIE “WE DO NOT SUPPORT
LEGALIZING MARIJUANA ”
JODIE ALTMAN “WE DO NOT SUPPORT
LEGALIZING MARIJUANA ”
JODIE ALTMAN IS “WE DO NOT SUPPORT
LEGALIZING MARIJUANA ”
JODIE ALTMAN IS WITH LEGALIZING MARIJUANA ”
JODIE ALTMAN IS WITH LEGALIZING MARIJUANA ”
JODIE ALTMAN IS WITH
KIDS LEGALIZING MARIJUANA ”
JODIE ALTMAN IS WITH
KIDS ESCAPING JODIE ALTMAN IS WITH
KIDS ESCAPING JODIE ALTMAN IS WITH
KIDS ESCAPING
DRUGS…AND JODIE ALTMAN IS WITH
KIDS ESCAPING
DRUGS…AND SAYS JODIE ALTMAN IS WITH
KIDS ESCAPING
DRUGS…AND SAYS IF KIDS ESCAPING
DRUGS…AND SAYS IF KIDS ESCAPING
DRUGS…AND SAYS IF
YOU KIDS ESCAPING
DRUGS…AND SAYS IF
YOU WANT KIDS ESCAPING
DRUGS…AND SAYS IF
YOU WANT TO KIDS ESCAPING
DRUGS…AND SAYS IF
YOU WANT TO LESSEN DRUGS…AND SAYS IF
YOU WANT TO LESSEN DRUGS…AND SAYS IF
YOU WANT TO LESSEN
THE DRUGS…AND SAYS IF
YOU WANT TO LESSEN
THE PENALTIES DRUGS…AND SAYS IF
YOU WANT TO LESSEN
THE PENALTIES FOR YOU WANT TO LESSEN
THE PENALTIES FOR YOU WANT TO LESSEN
THE PENALTIES FOR
POT YOU WANT TO LESSEN
THE PENALTIES FOR
POT FINE–BUT THE PENALTIES FOR
POT FINE–BUT THE PENALTIES FOR
POT FINE–BUT
LEGALIZING THE PENALTIES FOR
POT FINE–BUT
LEGALIZING IT THE PENALTIES FOR
POT FINE–BUT
LEGALIZING IT MAKES POT FINE–BUT
LEGALIZING IT MAKES POT FINE–BUT
LEGALIZING IT MAKES
NO POT FINE–BUT
LEGALIZING IT MAKES
NO SENSE POT FINE–BUT
LEGALIZING IT MAKES
NO SENSE AT POT FINE–BUT
LEGALIZING IT MAKES
NO SENSE AT ALL. LEGALIZING IT MAKES
NO SENSE AT ALL. LEGALIZING IT MAKES
NO SENSE AT ALL.
“ALL LEGALIZING IT MAKES
NO SENSE AT ALL.
“ALL OF LEGALIZING IT MAKES
NO SENSE AT ALL.
“ALL OF OUR LEGALIZING IT MAKES
NO SENSE AT ALL.
“ALL OF OUR KIDS LEGALIZING IT MAKES
NO SENSE AT ALL.
“ALL OF OUR KIDS ON NO SENSE AT ALL.
“ALL OF OUR KIDS ON NO SENSE AT ALL.
“ALL OF OUR KIDS ON
THE NO SENSE AT ALL.
“ALL OF OUR KIDS ON
THE CAMPUS NO SENSE AT ALL.
“ALL OF OUR KIDS ON
THE CAMPUS WILL NO SENSE AT ALL.
“ALL OF OUR KIDS ON
THE CAMPUS WILL TELL “ALL OF OUR KIDS ON
THE CAMPUS WILL TELL “ALL OF OUR KIDS ON
THE CAMPUS WILL TELL
YOU “ALL OF OUR KIDS ON
THE CAMPUS WILL TELL
YOU THAT “ALL OF OUR KIDS ON
THE CAMPUS WILL TELL
YOU THAT ONE “ALL OF OUR KIDS ON
THE CAMPUS WILL TELL
YOU THAT ONE OF “ALL OF OUR KIDS ON
THE CAMPUS WILL TELL
YOU THAT ONE OF THE THE CAMPUS WILL TELL
YOU THAT ONE OF THE THE CAMPUS WILL TELL
YOU THAT ONE OF THE
FIRST THE CAMPUS WILL TELL
YOU THAT ONE OF THE
FIRST DRUGS THE CAMPUS WILL TELL
YOU THAT ONE OF THE
FIRST DRUGS THEY YOU THAT ONE OF THE
FIRST DRUGS THEY YOU THAT ONE OF THE
FIRST DRUGS THEY
USED YOU THAT ONE OF THE
FIRST DRUGS THEY
USED IS YOU THAT ONE OF THE
FIRST DRUGS THEY
USED IS MARIJUANA YOU THAT ONE OF THE
FIRST DRUGS THEY
USED IS MARIJUANA WE FIRST DRUGS THEY
USED IS MARIJUANA WE FIRST DRUGS THEY
USED IS MARIJUANA WE
BELIEVE FIRST DRUGS THEY
USED IS MARIJUANA WE
BELIEVE IT’S FIRST DRUGS THEY
USED IS MARIJUANA WE
BELIEVE IT’S A FIRST DRUGS THEY
USED IS MARIJUANA WE
BELIEVE IT’S A GATEWAY. USED IS MARIJUANA WE
BELIEVE IT’S A GATEWAY. USED IS MARIJUANA WE
BELIEVE IT’S A GATEWAY.
” BELIEVE IT’S A GATEWAY.
” BELIEVE IT’S A GATEWAY.

WHICH BELIEVE IT’S A GATEWAY.

WHICH WAS BELIEVE IT’S A GATEWAY.

WHICH WAS THE BELIEVE IT’S A GATEWAY.

WHICH WAS THE SAME ”
WHICH WAS THE SAME ”
WHICH WAS THE SAME
TERM ”
WHICH WAS THE SAME
TERM THE ”
WHICH WAS THE SAME
TERM THE GOVERNOR WHICH WAS THE SAME
TERM THE GOVERNOR WHICH WAS THE SAME
TERM THE GOVERNOR
HIMSELF WHICH WAS THE SAME
TERM THE GOVERNOR
HIMSELF WAS WHICH WAS THE SAME
TERM THE GOVERNOR
HIMSELF WAS USING WHICH WAS THE SAME
TERM THE GOVERNOR
HIMSELF WAS USING TO TERM THE GOVERNOR
HIMSELF WAS USING TO TERM THE GOVERNOR
HIMSELF WAS USING TO
DESCRIBE TERM THE GOVERNOR
HIMSELF WAS USING TO
DESCRIBE IT, TERM THE GOVERNOR
HIMSELF WAS USING TO
DESCRIBE IT, LESS HIMSELF WAS USING TO
DESCRIBE IT, LESS HIMSELF WAS USING TO
DESCRIBE IT, LESS
THAN HIMSELF WAS USING TO
DESCRIBE IT, LESS
THAN A HIMSELF WAS USING TO
DESCRIBE IT, LESS
THAN A YEAR HIMSELF WAS USING TO
DESCRIBE IT, LESS
THAN A YEAR AGO. DESCRIBE IT, LESS
THAN A YEAR AGO. DESCRIBE IT, LESS
THAN A YEAR AGO.
“WHAT DESCRIBE IT, LESS
THAN A YEAR AGO.
“WHAT DO DESCRIBE IT, LESS
THAN A YEAR AGO.
“WHAT DO YOU DESCRIBE IT, LESS
THAN A YEAR AGO.
“WHAT DO YOU THINK THAN A YEAR AGO.
“WHAT DO YOU THINK THAN A YEAR AGO.
“WHAT DO YOU THINK
HAPPENED? THAN A YEAR AGO.
“WHAT DO YOU THINK
HAPPENED? ” “WHAT DO YOU THINK
HAPPENED? ” “WHAT DO YOU THINK
HAPPENED? ”
“…THERE’S “WHAT DO YOU THINK
HAPPENED? ”
“…THERE’S MONEY “WHAT DO YOU THINK
HAPPENED? ”
“…THERE’S MONEY TO HAPPENED? ”
“…THERE’S MONEY TO HAPPENED? ”
“…THERE’S MONEY TO
BE HAPPENED? ”
“…THERE’S MONEY TO
BE MADE HAPPENED? ”
“…THERE’S MONEY TO
BE MADE ” “…THERE’S MONEY TO
BE MADE ” “…THERE’S MONEY TO
BE MADE ”
SHE “…THERE’S MONEY TO
BE MADE ”
SHE THINKS “…THERE’S MONEY TO
BE MADE ”
SHE THINKS CUOMO’S BE MADE ”
SHE THINKS CUOMO’S BE MADE ”
SHE THINKS CUOMO’S
FLIP BE MADE ”
SHE THINKS CUOMO’S
FLIP FLOP BE MADE ”
SHE THINKS CUOMO’S
FLIP FLOP ON SHE THINKS CUOMO’S
FLIP FLOP ON SHE THINKS CUOMO’S
FLIP FLOP ON
LEGALIZING, SHE THINKS CUOMO’S
FLIP FLOP ON
LEGALIZING, AND SHE THINKS CUOMO’S
FLIP FLOP ON
LEGALIZING, AND HIS FLIP FLOP ON
LEGALIZING, AND HIS FLIP FLOP ON
LEGALIZING, AND HIS
URGENCY FLIP FLOP ON
LEGALIZING, AND HIS
URGENCY TO FLIP FLOP ON
LEGALIZING, AND HIS
URGENCY TO DO FLIP FLOP ON
LEGALIZING, AND HIS
URGENCY TO DO SO, LEGALIZING, AND HIS
URGENCY TO DO SO, LEGALIZING, AND HIS
URGENCY TO DO SO,
WAS LEGALIZING, AND HIS
URGENCY TO DO SO,
WAS INFLUENCED URGENCY TO DO SO,
WAS INFLUENCED URGENCY TO DO SO,
WAS INFLUENCED
MOSTLY URGENCY TO DO SO,
WAS INFLUENCED
MOSTLY BY URGENCY TO DO SO,
WAS INFLUENCED
MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES WAS INFLUENCED
MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES WAS INFLUENCED
MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES
THAT WAS INFLUENCED
MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES
THAT THE WAS INFLUENCED
MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES
THAT THE STATE WAS INFLUENCED
MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES
THAT THE STATE COULD MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES
THAT THE STATE COULD MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES
THAT THE STATE COULD
RAKE MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES
THAT THE STATE COULD
RAKE IN MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES
THAT THE STATE COULD
RAKE IN A MOSTLY BY ESTIMATES
THAT THE STATE COULD
RAKE IN A BILLION THAT THE STATE COULD
RAKE IN A BILLION THAT THE STATE COULD
RAKE IN A BILLION
DOLLARS THAT THE STATE COULD
RAKE IN A BILLION
DOLLARS A THAT THE STATE COULD
RAKE IN A BILLION
DOLLARS A YEAR THAT THE STATE COULD
RAKE IN A BILLION
DOLLARS A YEAR IN RAKE IN A BILLION
DOLLARS A YEAR IN RAKE IN A BILLION
DOLLARS A YEAR IN
NEW RAKE IN A BILLION
DOLLARS A YEAR IN
NEW REVENUE DOLLARS A YEAR IN
NEW REVENUE DOLLARS A YEAR IN
NEW REVENUE
“AND DOLLARS A YEAR IN
NEW REVENUE
“AND BECAUSE DOLLARS A YEAR IN
NEW REVENUE
“AND BECAUSE THERE’S NEW REVENUE
“AND BECAUSE THERE’S NEW REVENUE
“AND BECAUSE THERE’S
MONEY NEW REVENUE
“AND BECAUSE THERE’S
MONEY TO NEW REVENUE
“AND BECAUSE THERE’S
MONEY TO BE NEW REVENUE
“AND BECAUSE THERE’S
MONEY TO BE MADE “AND BECAUSE THERE’S
MONEY TO BE MADE “AND BECAUSE THERE’S
MONEY TO BE MADE
WE’VE “AND BECAUSE THERE’S
MONEY TO BE MADE
WE’VE LOST “AND BECAUSE THERE’S
MONEY TO BE MADE
WE’VE LOST TRACK “AND BECAUSE THERE’S
MONEY TO BE MADE
WE’VE LOST TRACK OF MONEY TO BE MADE
WE’VE LOST TRACK OF MONEY TO BE MADE
WE’VE LOST TRACK OF
LIVES MONEY TO BE MADE
WE’VE LOST TRACK OF
LIVES ” WE’VE LOST TRACK OF
LIVES ” WE’VE LOST TRACK OF
LIVES ”
THE WE’VE LOST TRACK OF
LIVES ”
THE LIVES WE’VE LOST TRACK OF
LIVES ”
THE LIVES OF WE’VE LOST TRACK OF
LIVES ”
THE LIVES OF YOUNG LIVES ”
THE LIVES OF YOUNG LIVES ”
THE LIVES OF YOUNG
PEOPLE LIVES ”
THE LIVES OF YOUNG
PEOPLE WHO, LIVES ”
THE LIVES OF YOUNG
PEOPLE WHO, EVEN THE LIVES OF YOUNG
PEOPLE WHO, EVEN THE LIVES OF YOUNG
PEOPLE WHO, EVEN
THOUGH THE LIVES OF YOUNG
PEOPLE WHO, EVEN
THOUGH CUOMO THE LIVES OF YOUNG
PEOPLE WHO, EVEN
THOUGH CUOMO SAYS PEOPLE WHO, EVEN
THOUGH CUOMO SAYS PEOPLE WHO, EVEN
THOUGH CUOMO SAYS
ITS PEOPLE WHO, EVEN
THOUGH CUOMO SAYS
ITS SALE PEOPLE WHO, EVEN
THOUGH CUOMO SAYS
ITS SALE WOULD PEOPLE WHO, EVEN
THOUGH CUOMO SAYS
ITS SALE WOULD BE THOUGH CUOMO SAYS
ITS SALE WOULD BE THOUGH CUOMO SAYS
ITS SALE WOULD BE
ONLY THOUGH CUOMO SAYS
ITS SALE WOULD BE
ONLY TO ITS SALE WOULD BE
ONLY TO ITS SALE WOULD BE
ONLY TO
ADULTS…MUCH ITS SALE WOULD BE
ONLY TO
ADULTS…MUCH LIKE ONLY TO
ADULTS…MUCH LIKE ONLY TO
ADULTS…MUCH LIKE
ALCOHOL… ADULTS…MUCH LIKE
ALCOHOL… ADULTS…MUCH LIKE
ALCOHOL…
” ADULTS…MUCH LIKE
ALCOHOL…
” UNLESS ADULTS…MUCH LIKE
ALCOHOL…
” UNLESS YOU ADULTS…MUCH LIKE
ALCOHOL…
” UNLESS YOU LIVE ALCOHOL…
” UNLESS YOU LIVE ALCOHOL…
” UNLESS YOU LIVE
UNDER ALCOHOL…
” UNLESS YOU LIVE
UNDER A ALCOHOL…
” UNLESS YOU LIVE
UNDER A ROCK, ALCOHOL…
” UNLESS YOU LIVE
UNDER A ROCK, YOU ” UNLESS YOU LIVE
UNDER A ROCK, YOU ” UNLESS YOU LIVE
UNDER A ROCK, YOU
UNDERSTAND ” UNLESS YOU LIVE
UNDER A ROCK, YOU
UNDERSTAND IT’S ” UNLESS YOU LIVE
UNDER A ROCK, YOU
UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING UNDER A ROCK, YOU
UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING UNDER A ROCK, YOU
UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING
TO UNDER A ROCK, YOU
UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING
TO BE UNDER A ROCK, YOU
UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING
TO BE ACCESSIBLE UNDER A ROCK, YOU
UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING
TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING
TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING
TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO
KIDS UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING
TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO
KIDS UNDER UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING
TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO
KIDS UNDER 21 UNDERSTAND IT’S GOING
TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO
KIDS UNDER 21 ” TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO
KIDS UNDER 21 ” TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO
KIDS UNDER 21 ”
ASSEMBLYMAN TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO
KIDS UNDER 21 ”
ASSEMBLYMAN DAVID KIDS UNDER 21 ”
ASSEMBLYMAN DAVID KIDS UNDER 21 ”
ASSEMBLYMAN DAVID
DIPIETRO KIDS UNDER 21 ”
ASSEMBLYMAN DAVID
DIPIETRO IS KIDS UNDER 21 ”
ASSEMBLYMAN DAVID
DIPIETRO IS ALSO ASSEMBLYMAN DAVID
DIPIETRO IS ALSO ASSEMBLYMAN DAVID
DIPIETRO IS ALSO
OPPOSED, ASSEMBLYMAN DAVID
DIPIETRO IS ALSO
OPPOSED, IN ASSEMBLYMAN DAVID
DIPIETRO IS ALSO
OPPOSED, IN PART DIPIETRO IS ALSO
OPPOSED, IN PART DIPIETRO IS ALSO
OPPOSED, IN PART
BECAUSE DIPIETRO IS ALSO
OPPOSED, IN PART
BECAUSE THE DIPIETRO IS ALSO
OPPOSED, IN PART
BECAUSE THE STATE’S OPPOSED, IN PART
BECAUSE THE STATE’S OPPOSED, IN PART
BECAUSE THE STATE’S
LESS OPPOSED, IN PART
BECAUSE THE STATE’S
LESS THAN OPPOSED, IN PART
BECAUSE THE STATE’S
LESS THAN STELLAR BECAUSE THE STATE’S
LESS THAN STELLAR BECAUSE THE STATE’S
LESS THAN STELLAR
ROLL BECAUSE THE STATE’S
LESS THAN STELLAR
ROLL OUT BECAUSE THE STATE’S
LESS THAN STELLAR
ROLL OUT OF BECAUSE THE STATE’S
LESS THAN STELLAR
ROLL OUT OF ITS LESS THAN STELLAR
ROLL OUT OF ITS LESS THAN STELLAR
ROLL OUT OF ITS
MEDICAL LESS THAN STELLAR
ROLL OUT OF ITS
MEDICAL MARIJUANA ROLL OUT OF ITS
MEDICAL MARIJUANA ROLL OUT OF ITS
MEDICAL MARIJUANA
PROGRAM, MEDICAL MARIJUANA
PROGRAM, MEDICAL MARIJUANA
PROGRAM,
“SO MEDICAL MARIJUANA
PROGRAM,
“SO I MEDICAL MARIJUANA
PROGRAM,
“SO I DON’T MEDICAL MARIJUANA
PROGRAM,
“SO I DON’T HAVE MEDICAL MARIJUANA
PROGRAM,
“SO I DON’T HAVE ANY PROGRAM,
“SO I DON’T HAVE ANY PROGRAM,
“SO I DON’T HAVE ANY
FAITH PROGRAM,
“SO I DON’T HAVE ANY
FAITH THAT PROGRAM,
“SO I DON’T HAVE ANY
FAITH THAT THE PROGRAM,
“SO I DON’T HAVE ANY
FAITH THAT THE BILL PROGRAM,
“SO I DON’T HAVE ANY
FAITH THAT THE BILL THE “SO I DON’T HAVE ANY
FAITH THAT THE BILL THE “SO I DON’T HAVE ANY
FAITH THAT THE BILL THE
GOVERNOR FAITH THAT THE BILL THE
GOVERNOR FAITH THAT THE BILL THE
GOVERNOR
PRESENTING FAITH THAT THE BILL THE
GOVERNOR
PRESENTING IS FAITH THAT THE BILL THE
GOVERNOR
PRESENTING IS GONNA GOVERNOR
PRESENTING IS GONNA GOVERNOR
PRESENTING IS GONNA
BE GOVERNOR
PRESENTING IS GONNA
BE ANY GOVERNOR
PRESENTING IS GONNA
BE ANY BETTER GOVERNOR
PRESENTING IS GONNA
BE ANY BETTER THAN PRESENTING IS GONNA
BE ANY BETTER THAN PRESENTING IS GONNA
BE ANY BETTER THAN
NTHE PRESENTING IS GONNA
BE ANY BETTER THAN
NTHE BIOLLS PRESENTING IS GONNA
BE ANY BETTER THAN
NTHE BIOLLS WE PRESENTING IS GONNA
BE ANY BETTER THAN
NTHE BIOLLS WE HAVE BE ANY BETTER THAN
NTHE BIOLLS WE HAVE BE ANY BETTER THAN
NTHE BIOLLS WE HAVE
PREVIOUSLY BE ANY BETTER THAN
NTHE BIOLLS WE HAVE
PREVIOUSLY ” NTHE BIOLLS WE HAVE
PREVIOUSLY ” NTHE BIOLLS WE HAVE
PREVIOUSLY ”
BUT NTHE BIOLLS WE HAVE
PREVIOUSLY ”
BUT DIPEIOTRO NTHE BIOLLS WE HAVE
PREVIOUSLY ”
BUT DIPEIOTRO IS NTHE BIOLLS WE HAVE
PREVIOUSLY ”
BUT DIPEIOTRO IS IN PREVIOUSLY ”
BUT DIPEIOTRO IS IN PREVIOUSLY ”
BUT DIPEIOTRO IS IN
THE PREVIOUSLY ”
BUT DIPEIOTRO IS IN
THE ALBANY BUT DIPEIOTRO IS IN
THE ALBANY BUT DIPEIOTRO IS IN
THE ALBANY
MINORITY,…AND BUT DIPEIOTRO IS IN
THE ALBANY
MINORITY,…AND WITH THE ALBANY
MINORITY,…AND WITH THE ALBANY
MINORITY,…AND WITH
CUOMO’S THE ALBANY
MINORITY,…AND WITH
CUOMO’S FELLOW MINORITY,…AND WITH
CUOMO’S FELLOW MINORITY,…AND WITH
CUOMO’S FELLOW
DEMOCRATS MINORITY,…AND WITH
CUOMO’S FELLOW
DEMOCRATS NOW CUOMO’S FELLOW
DEMOCRATS NOW CUOMO’S FELLOW
DEMOCRATS NOW
CONTROLLING CUOMO’S FELLOW
DEMOCRATS NOW
CONTROLLING BOTH DEMOCRATS NOW
CONTROLLING BOTH DEMOCRATS NOW
CONTROLLING BOTH
HOUSES DEMOCRATS NOW
CONTROLLING BOTH
HOUSES OF DEMOCRATS NOW
CONTROLLING BOTH
HOUSES OF THE DEMOCRATS NOW
CONTROLLING BOTH
HOUSES OF THE STATE CONTROLLING BOTH
HOUSES OF THE STATE CONTROLLING BOTH
HOUSES OF THE STATE
LEGISALTURE, CONTROLLING BOTH
HOUSES OF THE STATE
LEGISALTURE, HE CONTROLLING BOTH
HOUSES OF THE STATE
LEGISALTURE, HE MAY HOUSES OF THE STATE
LEGISALTURE, HE MAY HOUSES OF THE STATE
LEGISALTURE, HE MAY
HAVE HOUSES OF THE STATE
LEGISALTURE, HE MAY
HAVE CARTE HOUSES OF THE STATE
LEGISALTURE, HE MAY
HAVE CARTE BLANGE LEGISALTURE, HE MAY
HAVE CARTE BLANGE LEGISALTURE, HE MAY
HAVE CARTE BLANGE
HERE…AND LEGISALTURE, HE MAY
HAVE CARTE BLANGE
HERE…AND HE LEGISALTURE, HE MAY
HAVE CARTE BLANGE
HERE…AND HE YELLED HAVE CARTE BLANGE
HERE…AND HE YELLED HAVE CARTE BLANGE
HERE…AND HE YELLED
FOR HAVE CARTE BLANGE
HERE…AND HE YELLED
FOR THEM HAVE CARTE BLANGE
HERE…AND HE YELLED
FOR THEM TO HAVE CARTE BLANGE
HERE…AND HE YELLED
FOR THEM TO SIEZE HERE…AND HE YELLED
FOR THEM TO SIEZE HERE…AND HE YELLED
FOR THEM TO SIEZE
THE HERE…AND HE YELLED
FOR THEM TO SIEZE
THE DAY HERE…AND HE YELLED
FOR THEM TO SIEZE
THE DAY TO HERE…AND HE YELLED
FOR THEM TO SIEZE
THE DAY TO PASS FOR THEM TO SIEZE
THE DAY TO PASS FOR THEM TO SIEZE
THE DAY TO PASS
WHAT FOR THEM TO SIEZE
THE DAY TO PASS
WHAT HE FOR THEM TO SIEZE
THE DAY TO PASS
WHAT HE CALLED FOR THEM TO SIEZE
THE DAY TO PASS
WHAT HE CALLED AN THE DAY TO PASS
WHAT HE CALLED AN THE DAY TO PASS
WHAT HE CALLED AN
AMBITIOUS WHAT HE CALLED AN
AMBITIOUS WHAT HE CALLED AN
AMBITIOUS
PROGRESSIVE WHAT HE CALLED AN
AMBITIOUS
PROGRESSIVE AGENDA AMBITIOUS
PROGRESSIVE AGENDA AMBITIOUS
PROGRESSIVE AGENDA
“NOW AMBITIOUS
PROGRESSIVE AGENDA
“NOW IS AMBITIOUS
PROGRESSIVE AGENDA
“NOW IS THE AMBITIOUS
PROGRESSIVE AGENDA
“NOW IS THE TIME AMBITIOUS
PROGRESSIVE AGENDA
“NOW IS THE TIME TO PROGRESSIVE AGENDA
“NOW IS THE TIME TO PROGRESSIVE AGENDA
“NOW IS THE TIME TO
MAKE PROGRESSIVE AGENDA
“NOW IS THE TIME TO
MAKE THESE PROGRESSIVE AGENDA
“NOW IS THE TIME TO
MAKE THESE CHANGES “NOW IS THE TIME TO
MAKE THESE CHANGES “NOW IS THE TIME TO
MAKE THESE CHANGES
THERE “NOW IS THE TIME TO
MAKE THESE CHANGES
THERE ARE “NOW IS THE TIME TO
MAKE THESE CHANGES
THERE ARE NO “NOW IS THE TIME TO
MAKE THESE CHANGES
THERE ARE NO MORE MAKE THESE CHANGES
THERE ARE NO MORE MAKE THESE CHANGES
THERE ARE NO MORE
EXCUSES MAKE THESE CHANGES
THERE ARE NO MORE
EXCUSES MY MAKE THESE CHANGES
THERE ARE NO MORE
EXCUSES MY FREINDS THERE ARE NO MORE
EXCUSES MY FREINDS THERE ARE NO MORE
EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW THERE ARE NO MORE
EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW IS THERE ARE NO MORE
EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW IS TEH THERE ARE NO MORE
EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW IS TEH TIME THERE ARE NO MORE
EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW IS TEH TIME TO EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW IS TEH TIME TO EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW IS TEH TIME TO
STAND EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW IS TEH TIME TO
STAND UP EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW IS TEH TIME TO
STAND UP AND EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW IS TEH TIME TO
STAND UP AND DO EXCUSES MY FREINDS
NOW IS TEH TIME TO
STAND UP AND DO ALL NOW IS TEH TIME TO
STAND UP AND DO ALL NOW IS TEH TIME TO
STAND UP AND DO ALL
THE NOW IS TEH TIME TO
STAND UP AND DO ALL
THE THINGS NOW IS TEH TIME TO
STAND UP AND DO ALL
THE THINGS YOU NOW IS TEH TIME TO
STAND UP AND DO ALL
THE THINGS YOU SAY STAND UP AND DO ALL
THE THINGS YOU SAY STAND UP AND DO ALL
THE THINGS YOU SAY
YOU STAND UP AND DO ALL
THE THINGS YOU SAY
YOU WERE STAND UP AND DO ALL
THE THINGS YOU SAY
YOU WERE GOIGN STAND UP AND DO ALL
THE THINGS YOU SAY
YOU WERE GOIGN TO STAND UP AND DO ALL
THE THINGS YOU SAY
YOU WERE GOIGN TO DO THE THINGS YOU SAY
YOU WERE GOIGN TO DO THE THINGS YOU SAY
YOU WERE GOIGN TO DO
AND THE THINGS YOU SAY
YOU WERE GOIGN TO DO
AND MAKE THE THINGS YOU SAY
YOU WERE GOIGN TO DO
AND MAKE A YOU WERE GOIGN TO DO
AND MAKE A YOU WERE GOIGN TO DO
AND MAKE A
DEMOCRATIC YOU WERE GOIGN TO DO
AND MAKE A
DEMOCRATIC VISION YOU WERE GOIGN TO DO
AND MAKE A
DEMOCRATIC VISION A AND MAKE A
DEMOCRATIC VISION A AND MAKE A
DEMOCRATIC VISION A
REALITY DEMOCRATIC VISION A
REALITY REALITY THERE’S THERE’S ALREADY THERE’S ALREADY A THERE’S ALREADY A
BILL THERE’S ALREADY A
BILL FROM THERE’S ALREADY A
BILL FROM ALBANY’S THERE’S ALREADY A
BILL FROM ALBANY’S
DEMOCRATS THERE’S ALREADY A
BILL FROM ALBANY’S
DEMOCRATS THAT BILL FROM ALBANY’S
DEMOCRATS THAT DEMOCRATS THAT WOULD WOULD DIRECT WOULD DIRECT HALF WOULD DIRECT HALF
OF WOULD DIRECT HALF
OF ALL WOULD DIRECT HALF
OF ALL MONEY WOULD DIRECT HALF
OF ALL MONEY FROM WOULD DIRECT HALF
OF ALL MONEY FROM
TAXING WOULD DIRECT HALF
OF ALL MONEY FROM
TAXING MARIJUANA, WOULD DIRECT HALF
OF ALL MONEY FROM
TAXING MARIJUANA, TO OF ALL MONEY FROM
TAXING MARIJUANA, TO OF ALL MONEY FROM
TAXING MARIJUANA, TO
GRANTS OF ALL MONEY FROM
TAXING MARIJUANA, TO
GRANTS FOR OF ALL MONEY FROM
TAXING MARIJUANA, TO
GRANTS FOR MINIORITY TAXING MARIJUANA, TO
GRANTS FOR MINIORITY TAXING MARIJUANA, TO
GRANTS FOR MINIORITY
COMMUNITIES, TAXING MARIJUANA, TO
GRANTS FOR MINIORITY
COMMUNITIES, WHICH GRANTS FOR MINIORITY
COMMUNITIES, WHICH GRANTS FOR MINIORITY
COMMUNITIES, WHICH
SPONSORS GRANTS FOR MINIORITY
COMMUNITIES, WHICH
SPONSORS CLAIM COMMUNITIES, WHICH
SPONSORS CLAIM COMMUNITIES, WHICH
SPONSORS CLAIM
WERE COMMUNITIES, WHICH
SPONSORS CLAIM
WERE THE COMMUNITIES, WHICH
SPONSORS CLAIM
WERE THE MOST SPONSORS CLAIM
WERE THE MOST SPONSORS CLAIM
WERE THE MOST
ADVERSLY SPONSORS CLAIM
WERE THE MOST
ADVERSLY IMPACTED WERE THE MOST
ADVERSLY IMPACTED WERE THE MOST
ADVERSLY IMPACTED
BY WERE THE MOST
ADVERSLY IMPACTED
BY THE WERE THE MOST
ADVERSLY IMPACTED
BY THE PROHIBITION ADVERSLY IMPACTED
BY THE PROHIBITION ADVERSLY IMPACTED
BY THE PROHIBITION
ON ADVERSLY IMPACTED
BY THE PROHIBITION
ON POT, ADVERSLY IMPACTED
BY THE PROHIBITION
ON POT, THROUGH BY THE PROHIBITION
ON POT, THROUGH BY THE PROHIBITION
ON POT, THROUGH
HIGHER ON POT, THROUGH
HIGHER ON POT, THROUGH
HIGHER
INCARCERATION ON POT, THROUGH
HIGHER
INCARCERATION RATES. HIGHER
INCARCERATION RATES. HIGHER
INCARCERATION RATES.
AMONG HIGHER
INCARCERATION RATES.
AMONG ITS HIGHER
INCARCERATION RATES.
AMONG ITS SPONSORS, INCARCERATION RATES.
AMONG ITS SPONSORS, INCARCERATION RATES.
AMONG ITS SPONSORS,
BUFFALO’S INCARCERATION RATES.
AMONG ITS SPONSORS,
BUFFALO’S CRYSTAL AMONG ITS SPONSORS,
BUFFALO’S CRYSTAL AMONG ITS SPONSORS,
BUFFALO’S CRYSTAL
PEOPLES-STOKES, AMONG ITS SPONSORS,
BUFFALO’S CRYSTAL
PEOPLES-STOKES, WHO BUFFALO’S CRYSTAL
PEOPLES-STOKES, WHO BUFFALO’S CRYSTAL
PEOPLES-STOKES, WHO
WHO BUFFALO’S CRYSTAL
PEOPLES-STOKES, WHO
WHO WAS

18 thoughts on “Recreational marijuana in NYS? Governor Cuomo calls for legalizing it”

  • Let's analyze her arguments. Marijuana is considered, by her, to be a gateway drug and should be illegal based on the possibility a person may try another drug. Based on this premise, alcohol should most definitely be illegal because most people who try other drugs have, without a doubt, drank alcohol. Let's look at her second argument which begins with her statement "unless you live under a rock, you understand that it's going to be accessible to kids under 21". Therefore according to her logic, alcohol should be illegal because most people had their first taste of alcohol before the age of 21. Lastly, she asserts that the only reason Cuomo is legalizing marijuana is that "there's money to be made". She failed to mention that 60% of Americans support the legalization of marijuana and over 63% of New Yorkers support legalization, therefore her claim that it is all about the money fails. It's about the will of the people, something that she is willing to ignore.

  • Cuomo is a gangster and nothing more. He wants to legalize cannabis because he and his cronies are in position to make money from it. New York State taxes are only second to California. Cuomo is a gangster.

  • Sounds like NYS plan is to disarm everyone but the criminals, and then keep everyone drugged. State is going right down the toilet.

  • Gateway drug? Teens will do it anyway legally or not. Anyone over 21 should be able to buy it legally. I don't agree to smoking and driving just like alcohol but for recreational use it's not that serious wake up people. legalize it tax it and use the money for something useful like fixing the subway's, bridges and roads.

  • I (based on no facts at all) really believe that marijuana is a gateway drug. Remember, Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny are real too.

  • The only reason it is illegal in the first place is because of racism. Government used the drug to scare the crap out of white america in the 1940 and 50's, stating that it made immigrants and African Americans crazed. It should never have been illegal.

  • There are only two kinds of people that oppose the legalization of cannabis the ones that are ignorant on the subject and the ones that make money off of it being illegal.

  • Jody is a complete idiot. It's been proven over and over that cannabis is not a gateway to hard drugs,like the ones in Jody's medicine cabinet,it's just the opposite.

  • I'll b 21 in March iv been smoking since 13 for for mental health issues and iv never tried other drugs same with my bros and friends I was not raised to throw away my life

  • Smh….maybe she should try smoking some. Who cares if it is money thing. Weed is always going to be around..just about everyone smokes it. So why wouldn't they legalize and tax it to make money? They need to make money back from having these people locked up on these retarded weed charges for years.

  • I drink only water. I was able to stop smoking cigarettes 5 years ago with the help of cannabis. I eat healthy food most of the time. I don't eat meat as often as I used too. I try to lead a healthy life because, cannabis taught me the legal stuff is unhealthy. Sugar,caffeine, alcohol, and junk food among other stuff are the things that should be demonized. Cannabis is a proven medicine. No doubting anymore

  • Come on already let's be real we talkin about pot not heroin or coke and it's not a gateway drug and if you legalize it it keeps it off the streets so the kids can't sell in school or get a hold of it it makes sense come on already and if the New Yorkers can't get it they will go to Massachusetts or New Jersey or anywhere else so it's New York loss If You Don't Legalize It it's not a big deal you do it move on treated like alcohol you buy it you go home your mind your business it's common sense obviously you Meatheads never smoked it when you were younger it does nothing to you

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *